Fabric Material:
- 100% Certified Organic Cotton ring-spun jersey
- Light fabric (5.3 oz/yd² (180 g/m²))
- Runs true to size
6 Easy Step To Grab This Product:
- Click the button “Buy this shirt”
- Choose your style: men, women, toddlers, …
- Pic Any color you like!
- Choose size.
- Enter the delivery address.
- Wait for your shirt and let’s take a photograph.
Shipping:
It takes 1-3 days to fulfill an order, after which it’s shipped out. The shipping time depends on your location, but can be estimated as follows: USA: 2-7 business days International: 10-20 business days. Available Size: XS, S, M, L, XL, 2XL, 3XL, 4XL, 5XL Available Color: Black, Cardinal Red, Forest Green, Gold, Navy, Royal, Sport Grey, White…STORAGE INSTRUCTIONS:
Do not use detergent containing chlorine, Do not use detergent, Drying, normal temperature, low heat. Regular ironing can be done by steam or dry ironing, and ironing cannot be more than 110 degrees Celsius. Delivery Your order will be printed exclusively for you within a few days. If you are in the US, Canada or Europe, you will receive your order within 3-7 business days after printing is complete. For all other countries, please allow between 10-14 business days. And you wanna design your own shirt by yourself for your team, your group or your family, you can sent us your design to gmal address [email protected].. We will make it for you. This shirt the official design from Hulktee.com. Available for T-shirt, hoodie, tank top, long sleeve, sweater, youth tee, onesie for men and women. Have a nice day!| SHIPMENT METHOD | PROCESSING TIME | ESTIMATED DELIVERY TIME | SHIPMENT COST |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic US | 1-3 business days | 2-5 business day | USA First Hoodie or Sweat: $8 Additional Hoodie or Sweat: $2 First Shirt: $5 Additional Shirts: $2 |
| International | 2-5 business days | 10-20 business day | International Hoodie or Sweat: $10 Shirt: $8 |
| SHIPMENT METHOD | PROCESSING TIME | ESTIMATED DELIVERY TIME | SHIPMENT COST |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic UK | 1-3 business days | 2-5 business day | UK First Hoodie or Sweat: $8 Additional Hoodie or Sweat: $2 First Shirt: $5 Additional Shirts: $2 |
| Europe | 1-3 business days | 10-20 business day | Europe First Hoodie or Sweat: $8 Additional Hoodie or Sweat: $2 First Shirt: $5 Additional Shirts: $2 |
This…. This is making me think…. They’re BOTH drunk…. Neither ONE of them is capable of giving true consent…. Doesn’t that mean that they actually both raped each other? We know that it’s possible for a woman to rape a man…. If he was drunk and she wasn’t, and they had sex, and he regretted it or felt shame because of what he couldn’t control, surely that would be rape? So… If both were drunk, and both felt shame and regret over their lack of control….. Hmmm. Edit: a lot of replies to this comment have reminded me that legal rape is differently defined than my assumption of what rape is, specifically, it being required that penetration has occurred, for rape to occur. This actually clears up something for me, that I think we’ve all noticed in news reports about female offenders who force sex on children, and the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and media choosing not to use the word “rape” in their reports: if what she did, doesn’t satisfy the legal definition of “rape”, that could (maybe) explain why they so often use words that seem to downplay what she did, versus when a man rapes a child, maybe in part because the word “rape” carries a very visceral and violent image with it, and the words “sexually assaulted” are vague and used for too wide a gamut of possible offenses… hmm. Still, another example of how it gets downplayed, when women assault someone, I guess, regardless of the possibility that it might have something to do with media trying not to get sued for “inaccurate reporting” or whatever…
Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt, hoodie, long sleeve, v-neck tee
fun fact: the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and UK has a stupid law that means this isnt technically true here. a woman can sexually assault a man, but not rape him. because our definitions are bullshit. Need to penetrated by a penis for it to be classed as rape in the UK I believe, woman don’t have penis’ so therefore cannot rape a man. It’ll be “downgraded” to sexual assault. By that logic, only a man can rape another man. Assault by penetration isn’t considered rape? If a man instead of putting his dick inside a woman puts a phallic object it would be rape or assault by penetration? In Germany that would be considered rape. Any sexual act that involves pentration of a bodily orifice. No genders or body parts are mentioned.
this is my understanding too. but iirc sexual assault can carry the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and same sentence as rape. its judges discretion. The maximum sentence for sexual assault is ten years imprisonment, while for rape it’s life. If, however, there is any anal penetration involved it is the more serious offence of assault by penetration, which has the same maximum sentence as rape. The legal distinction between rape and assault by penetration is only because the latter includes sexual penetration only of the vagina and anus; while putting your dick in someone’s mouth without their consent is sufficient for a charge of rape. If a woman pegs a drunk dude is she raping him then? If “no because it’s not a real penis” then could this create some sort of loophole around prosthetic penises in general?
Some information about Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt
A drunk guy can have an erect penis though. Same as when he is sleeping. So a woman could get penetrated without the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and guy’s consent, no? In India a woman can’t do that either as sexual assault and rape are defined as man on woman crime (unless the man in question is a minor but that’s under another section. ). Another fun fact. We don’t use the word “rape” in Canada’s judicial system. Regardless of gender, it’s Sexual Assault. Or, maybe, just maybe, in the real world, which I know is hard to adjust to, maybe it’s possible that people get drunk, get horny, and want to have sex, and then wake up the next day. Maybe they regret it, maybe they don’t. But classifying that scenario as rape- in the same way that someone who is black out drunk, doesn’t know what is happening, is not cognizant to make a decision, and wakes up with no idea what happened- is rape, is wild to me. People go out to have drinks and get laid all the time- both men and women. Following this logic rigidly just leads to the conclusion that people are constantly running around raping each other all the time. Completely idiotic.
No because most countries specifically only count it as rape if the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and victim was a woman. Welcome to earth, it’s fucked. This is the exact same reason I stopped watching switched at birth. Had an entire season long plot calling this guy a rapist because he had sex while drunk with a girl who was also drunk. Girl didn’t even think she was raped, she had to be convinced by her friends and family that she was raped. Definition of “actually, I change my mind now so that means you raped me” This poster is 17 years old. Yes it’s outdated. That miThis poster is 17 years old. Yes it’s outdated. That might be because it’s 17 years old. It’s almost old enough to consent itself There have also been studies that have identified drinking and appearing to drink more than they have as a predatory tactic used by rapists to have ‘plausible’ deniability regardless of the circumstances. One of the things I kept getting asked after my assault was whether my rapist had been drinking. Uh yeah, but unless he had put wine bottle corks in his ears to keep himself from hearing the many many times I was saying “no” and “stop”, drinking had nothing to do with what happened.
Last time I saw these in a Reddit post, I was assured they weren’t real by some, and were limited to literally one university by others. This was investigated by Daily Dot years ago and it was confirmed by the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and vice president for campus life and student engagement that this was a student made poster from 2008. So either your school managed to get a copy of an obscure (and by that point, out of print) poster from a student union at a small South Carolina University, or you are misremembering and your memory has conflated this poster with a similar one you saw over a decade ago, the same way people swear they remember a cornucopia on the Fruit of the Loom logo or Berenstain Bears being spelled “Berenstein”. I am 100% willing to admit that whoever put it up at my school didn’t have permission from the original artist. It’s the Jake and Josie poster, though. Pretty notorious, and sparked some discussions in my classes (I was a SOC major).
Obviously I can’t speak to your experience specifically. Just wanted to point out that the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and origin of this specific poster IS known at this point and many of the people claiming to remember it are probably mistaken (though possibly not all of them), given the unlikelyhood of it having much of a wide reach. (No, I’m not THE 5th Law. I liked the name and stole it, lol. Look at the spelling. That particular user is long gone, I believe). Obviously I can’t speak to your experience specifically. Just wanted to point out that the origin of this specific poster IS known at this point and many of the people claiming to remember it are probably mistaken (though possibly not all of them), given the unlikelyhood of it having much of a wide reach. That’s perfectly fair, and I understand where you’re coming from RE: the Mandela Effect. I remember this poster specifically because of the conversations it touched off.
The first of which being my painting crew seeing it during the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and summer (best summer job ever, BTW). It was posted in the lobby of one of the dorms. Thankfully, every one of us thought it was absurd. It popped up in a few other places the following school year, then we ended up discussing it (and consent in general) in a couple of my classes. As to the Coastal Carolina logo being on it, it probably had that. A lot of the PSAs I remember seeing bore the mark of the agency or institution they originated from. No, I’m not THE 5th Law. I liked the name and stole it, lol. Look at the spelling. That particular user is long gone, I believe Even if I was misinformed by previous threads, it doesn’t change that this is only recirculated because it feeds Reddit’s male persecution complex. I haven’t seen any more evidence for your position than the other though. Both are just things someone said to me in a thread.
I honestly couldn’t speak to how things are now. A few years back, I worked in social services and even amongst “professionals”, these attitudes weren’t just normalized, but baked into practices and procedures. Our attitudes about sexual assault and its unfortunately close cousin IPV are stuck in the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and 1950s. Women are delicate flowers and men are invincible monsters. That’s disingenuous and misses the point. Yes, obviously more men commit sexual assault than women but society refuses to acknowledge that women can commit sexual assault at all. It’s not about saying both genders commit the same amount of sexual assault, it’s about saying both genders have the capacity for it. Going by surveys about 1 in 10 sexual offenders are female, which should be large enough to take seriously. And most people don’t take it seriously I’m sure if we all pull together we can get forresja to say “Reddit male persecution complex” at least one more time before this thread dies
I think if you worked in a field that regularly dealt with sexual violence and IPV like I did, you’d be shocked. While a majority of my IPV victims were men, there wasn’t a single service available for male victims. My first introduction to this was when I asked our DV shelter about getting help to this one guy. She literally chuckled and said something to the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and effect of “oh we don’t do men here”. Women had shelters, counseling, and literally just money available. Lest you think I’m being one-sided, I once arranged a secret escape in the middle of the night to get a woman and her son to a bus station so she could leave the state and escape her abusive boyfriend. My point is, men and women can be pretty shitty to each other, and antiquated views on gender roles have no place in modern society.
There is a reason that the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and services offered are so lopsided. It’s because women are much more likely to be victims of interpersonal and sexual violence than men. To ignore that is to paint a false equivalency. If we’re going to improve the situation we’re in, we need to look at it with open eyes. I do encourage men to start non profit shelters for men though. If you think you can fill a need you should do it. You’re pulling straight out of the bigot playbook. “Civil rights was 60 years ago, racism doesn’t exist anymore!” No, something not being “like it used to be” does not mean it isn’t a problem. Fuck off with that bs. I mean I get you. Reddit is like the victim Olympics and everyone gets off on being a victim. But it’s ok to just be like alright I was wrong on this one. Yeah. It’s just recycled for rage engagement every now and again. This was absolutely problematic at the time it was made, but I think it points to how conversations about consent have evolved in the nearly two decades since. The fact that people engage with this like it’s still a thing is sad. “Do they still make these?” No, and they haven’t since before a lot of you were born. Funny enough, I think Neil Gorsuch’s majority opinion on the interpretation of Title VII with respect for equal treatment by gender addresses this issue. “If you fire a man for dating men, but do not fire a woman for dating men, then you have treated someone differently based on sex.” This is against the plain language of the law that sex is in fact, One of the protected classes defined by the title. (Partial paraphrase) edit: it was title VII in the case I mentioned, not title IX.I saw an almost identical poster to this when I was in college in 2018 sooo not sure what you are talking about
Anecdote is not the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and plural of data. I am basing this off the facts concerning this particular poster, which was designed and used in 2008 at Coastal Carolina University. Feel free to post about the poster you saw, but I’ll continue being confidently correct (with source) in the meantime. Guess it depends if you interpret OP as asking about one specific poster (seems unlikely), or just about the general message behind the poster (way more likely) Posters about consent are a much broader category, and are not inherently problematic. Nor are they generally used to farm outrage-based engagement. This one particular poster which gets reposted all the time does. Regardless of the intent of OP, it is silly that this particular poster is still being posted about nearly 20 years after it was used. Even the “current” poster from that school in the article still implies that you can’t consent if you aren’t sober and that it’s sexual assault, but the question still stands if two equally drunk people have sex consensually.
Even the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and poster from 2015 from that same school still says if you have sex without being sober it is automatically sexual assault Which would absolutely be true if one person was sober and one was not. And if neither is sober, it still could be true. That’s actually part of what is meant by “the conversation about consent evolving in the nearly two decades since.” Tbf even if it’s old and technically legally untrue…it’s probably still the verdict if you end up in court. If she had regrets or a fuzzy memory in the morning and decides to report you, you’re fucked. TBf no one should be having sex with someone drink enough to have a “fuzzy memory” about it. Keep it in your pants unless you’re both sure that you’re both sure. End of story
And this idea that women can just claim anything and get a man thrown in jail is such bullshit. Majority of rapists walk. Get off your MRA whine train and look at the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and actual reality The person above you was probably referring to such a scenario, in which case it would be hypocritical to hold the guy to a higher standard when he’s equally incapable of making a rational decision. Your point is nonsensical. If they’re both that drunk, neither of them can consent. You’re making the false presumption that the man is not also black out drunk. True, they won’t get thrown in jail most of the time. That doesn’t matter though. The court of public opinion is what matters. People are fired from jobs, lose their careers, etc. far before the jury says they’re innocent. And even if they’re found not guilty, their reputation is tarnished forever. Look at male public figures who were being extorted by their accusers, and you’ll see that.
Since mabelfruity responded and then immediately blocked me, here’s my answer to them. I’m not making the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and false presumption that the man was not also black out drunk. I’m saying that no one should be having sex with anyone who’s to drunk to remember in the morning. That includes if the man is black out drunk. If you can’t trust yourself to not have sex while too drunk to remember in the morning, don’t get that drunk in public. In a case where both people chose to become so drunk that they can’t remember having sex than they both really fucked up. As to your second point, I was responding to someone who specifically was talking about court. But also, let me point you to all the woman victims who’ve had their reputation tarnished by the court of public opinion for speaking up against their rapists and abusers.
13 years ago Obama sent his “Dear Colleague” letter that further reinforced this nonsense. This was part of their identity politics campaign strategy that has merely gotten worse. If you are drunk and kill someone, you are responsible. If you get drunk and have sex, you are responsible. So the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and same rules I’ve been following my whole life, got it Agree. The thing is there is a point where you can be so drunk that you won’t be physically capable of killing someone or consenting to sex. This poster does a terrible job of spreading that message because the people in the picture both look lucid enough to consent (and to kill someone). If you are drunk enough it also is legally an excuse (depending on your country). Here in Germany it’s 3 per mil, which is a really high level (about the amount a normal person falls into coma and not far away from ending deadly). It dosen’t count if you just got so drunk just to get the free pass in the first place.
Actually not really true where I live. If you are really drunk, like 3,5‰ or something along those lines and you didn’t plan to kill someone beforehand, you can’t be charged with murder, because you were unsound of mind in that moment. The German word is „Unzurechnungsfähig“. Basically means you aren’t really responsible. If you are asleep and kill someone, you are responsible. If you are asleep and have sex, you are not. The same rules do not apply in these scenarios. If having sex with a drunk person who cannot consent isn’t illegal, then the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and rapists of Kelsey Belnap (TW: account of rape) did nothing wrong. She passed out occasionally, but she did not resist and “willingly” performed oral sex on the perpetrators. If the car didn’t want me to drive it, why did it turn on so easily with one push of the button? why did it signal when i gently pressed its stalk?
Except it seems to be a lot harder to take advantage of a drunk person and make them kill someone than it is to take advantage of a drunk person and have sex with them. Not quite equivalent. Imo it depends on how drunk, and intentions, but there is a lot of nuance. But in this situation didn’t Josie also rape Jake? They should both be charged…if both people drink, and the Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt and by the same token and woman is too drunk to consent, so is the man smhWtf is this? What idiot made this? Is the organization who made this actually trying to make it sound like if two drunk people have sex, the man will be charged with rape? This looks like some fear-mongering to try to scare men into thinking women are out to get them. It was posted at some college campus over a decade ago, the image went viral on Twitter and the posters were never seen again except this image getting reposted on this subreddit and several others repeatedly, potentially being the longest-lasting karma farm on the site. Yeah sometimes it feels like I see this stupid poster at least once a day. It’s really good at generating outrage which is why people keep using it 15 years later
Some information about Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt
Be the first to review “Public Service Broadcasting UK Tour 2025 shirt”
You must be logged in to post a review.
- Length from the highest point of the collar to the bottom hem.
- Chest straight across, armpit to armpit, with the shirt laid flat.
- Sleeve from the center back of the collar to the cuff.
| Size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|
| S | 2871 | 1846 |
| M | 2974 | 2051 |
| L | 3076 | 2256 |
| XL | 3179 | 2461 |
| 2XL | 3281 | 2666 |
| 3XL | 3384 | 2871 |
| 4XL | 3486 | 3076 |
| 5XL | 3589 | 3281 |
| Size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|
| S | 2564 | 1641 |
| M | 2666 | 1743 |
| L | 26.567 | 1846 |
| XL | 2769 | 19.750 |
| 2XL | 27.971 | 21.655 |
| 3XL | 28.572 | 22.758 |
| Size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|
| S | 2871 | 1846 |
| M | 2974 | 2051 |
| L | 3076 | 2256 |
| XL | 3179 | 2461 |
| 2XL | 3281 | 2666 |
| 3XL | 3384 | 2871 |
| Size | Length | Chest | Sleeve |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 2666 | 2051 | 33.585 |
| M | 2769 | 2256 | 34.588 |
| L | 2871 | 2461 | 35.590 |
| XL | 2974 | 2666 | 36.593 |
| 2XL | 3076 | 2871 | 37.595 |
| 3XL | 3179 | 3076 | 38.598 |
| 4XL | 3281 | 3281 | 38.598 |
| 5XL | 3486 | 3384 | 38.598 |
| Size | Length | Chest | Sleeve |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 2769 | 2051 | 34.588 |
| M | 2871 | 2256 | 35.590 |
| L | 2974 | 2461 | 36.593 |
| XL | 3076 | 2666 | 37.595 |
| 2XL | 3179 | 2871 | 38.598 |
| 3XL | 3281 | 3076 | 3999 |
| 4XL | 3384 | 3281 | 39.5100 |
| 5XL | 3486 | 3486 | 40102 |
| Size | Length | Chest | Sleeve |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 2871 | 1846 | 33.585 |
| M | 2974 | 2051 | 3589 |
| L | 3076 | 2358 | 36.593 |
| XL | 3179 | 2461 | 3897 |
| 2XL | 3281 | 2666 | 39.5100 |
| 3XL | 3384 | 2871 | 39.5100 |
| Size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|
| S | 2769 | 1846 |
| M | 2871 | 2051 |
| L | 2974 | 2256 |
| XL | 3076 | 2461 |
| 2XL | 3179 | 2666 |
| Size | Youth size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 6-8 | 20.552 | 1641 |
| M | 10-12 | 2256 | 1743 |
| L | 14-16 | 23.560 | 1846 |
| XL | 18-20 | 2564 | 1948 |
| Size | Youth size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 6-8 | 2153 | 1743 |
| M | 10-12 | 22.557 | 1846 |
| L | 14-16 | 2461 | 1948 |
| XL | 18-20 | 25.565 | 2051 |
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.