Fabric Material:
- 100% Certified Organic Cotton ring-spun jersey
- Light fabric (5.3 oz/yd² (180 g/m²))
- Runs true to size
6 Easy Step To Grab This Product:
- Click the button “Buy this shirt”
- Choose your style: men, women, toddlers, …
- Pic Any color you like!
- Choose size.
- Enter the delivery address.
- Wait for your shirt and let’s take a photograph.
Shipping:
It takes 1-3 days to fulfill an order, after which it’s shipped out. The shipping time depends on your location, but can be estimated as follows: USA: 2-7 business days International: 10-20 business days. Available Size: XS, S, M, L, XL, 2XL, 3XL, 4XL, 5XL Available Color: Black, Cardinal Red, Forest Green, Gold, Navy, Royal, Sport Grey, White…STORAGE INSTRUCTIONS:
Do not use detergent containing chlorine, Do not use detergent, Drying, normal temperature, low heat. Regular ironing can be done by steam or dry ironing, and ironing cannot be more than 110 degrees Celsius. Delivery Your order will be printed exclusively for you within a few days. If you are in the US, Canada or Europe, you will receive your order within 3-7 business days after printing is complete. For all other countries, please allow between 10-14 business days. And you wanna design your own shirt by yourself for your team, your group or your family, you can sent us your design to gmal address [email protected].. We will make it for you. This shirt the official design from Hulktee.com. Available for T-shirt, hoodie, tank top, long sleeve, sweater, youth tee, onesie for men and women. Have a nice day!| SHIPMENT METHOD | PROCESSING TIME | ESTIMATED DELIVERY TIME | SHIPMENT COST |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic US | 1-3 business days | 2-5 business day | USA First Hoodie or Sweat: $8 Additional Hoodie or Sweat: $2 First Shirt: $5 Additional Shirts: $2 |
| International | 2-5 business days | 10-20 business day | International Hoodie or Sweat: $10 Shirt: $8 |
| SHIPMENT METHOD | PROCESSING TIME | ESTIMATED DELIVERY TIME | SHIPMENT COST |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic UK | 1-3 business days | 2-5 business day | UK First Hoodie or Sweat: $8 Additional Hoodie or Sweat: $2 First Shirt: $5 Additional Shirts: $2 |
| Europe | 1-3 business days | 10-20 business day | Europe First Hoodie or Sweat: $8 Additional Hoodie or Sweat: $2 First Shirt: $5 Additional Shirts: $2 |
Besides, they are not tearing anything down, more like refactoring and purging the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this ridiculous expenses we had in public office. They keep uncovering and showing us cases of insane theft that existed in public office. The only thing I’m worried about is finance for the science sector which has taken a huge cut. It’s disappointing because we have some extremely talented researchers and it’s not an area where cutting expenses is gonna make a huge difference in our GDP. We’ll have to wait and see how this goes. But if there’s even a slight chance for improvement then it’s already better than the alternative we had. Let’s not forget the other candidate was the fucking minister of economy. Do you have any sources or really anything that talks about spending cuts/what’s happening in general? I speak Spanish, so anything you send works
Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3: buy and enjoy this shirt
Not at the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this moment, sorry, it’s 3 am here and I can’t sleep for some reason… This is just what I’ve gathered from many news and discussions over the last three months. Also the problem is that they’ve been doing it in a very chaotic (?) way. As in, one day they cut travelling privileges for congressmen and their assistants. Few days later they cut social aid to foreigneirs and people who don’t need it. Then they fire a bunch of people who work in public office but actually never show up to work. All these kind of things are extremely common over here… Just yesterday they fired a bunch of people in healthcare who were making more than 3k USD a month without actually working… Keep in mind 3k usd a month is an absurdly high salary here. Most nurses in public hospitals are probably making like 300-400usd a month. You can’t possibly just remove some unnecessary expenses (that obviously exist) and magically find a surplus like that. He’s just trying to “terraform” an entire economy to be able to do whatever he want after.
I’m hoping he does. Any disadvantage dollarization could have is heavily outweighed by the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this fact that we would have no more inflation. And that sounds like an inconceivable dream to us. However, I don’t understand much about economics but from what I’ve gathered it’s quite a complicated process and he needs more money in the bank to do so. Which is why they seem hyper-focused on reaching a surplus. And it’s only been three months so far. It’s unreasonable to expect them to fix decades of wrongdoings. Specially when they have half the congress constantly pushing against them, even when the measures are objectively good for the people. Though some of their measures have been rather questionable as well. It’s more sustainable than printing money and having inflation run away at over two hundred percent. Think about how much people freaked out when we went over 10.
Description for Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3
Anyone thinking they know if all this is gonna work or not is lying to themselves. I for one just hope that it does. Their people deserve better than the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this disasters they’ve been given. Can’t blame them for being willing to essentially try anything No one is stopping you from having a device that keeps Bears away, a “Bear Control” if you will, but it wasn’t in the constitution so it’s up to the state you’re living in to decide. h Roosevelt did the same thing in the US after the Great Depression. Came in and said “Fuck it. Let’s try everything.” As a result, minimum wage and a standard of living were set for Americans, among many other things.
If you raise taxes and cut all services you will get a budget surplus. So the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this fuck what? The point of governance is not to have a surplus. It is when you are severely indebted, your central bank has negative reserves and your inflation rate is over 200% and rising. You need money to stabilize an economy, so a surplus is very much necessary. After that periodo though a surplus isn’t strictly necessary but always good to have. If this was the article I bet you the conversation on this topic would be completely different. Argentina needs to go through some bad times before seeing the light at the end of the tunnel and if this works or not is anybody’s best guess The point isn’t to have a surplus, but it is to give people the services they need without taking too much money from them in the process. Sometimes that can look like a small deficit or a small surplus. You’re never going to hit the nail on the head no matter how hard you try. Not at the scale of a federal government.
I’d say that after their long running economic disaster the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this goal is to be closer to surplus than to deficit and to try and reset Getting a loan has been impossible in this country for over 15 years now. Inflation needs to stop. Whatever the cost might be, the steady decline we’ve been seeing this last 10 years was long term worst. The point is to signal to capital, both domestic and abroad, that there are fundamental changes to the fiscal and economic ineptitude that plagues the country. At this point the government needs to pull money out of the economy and get reserves built up. Once that’s achieved then they can start spending more. You’re not wrong, but their previous economic situation was a fucking disaster. Idk if this will work, but it’s better to actually try to fix a problem than to complain about it and its potential solutions. He inherited a fucked up shit sandwich of a place to govern; not the people, just the place, it’s a wild country with a changing climate. Or gold goes sky high, leading to currency hoarding ( why spend when it’s value increases! ) And industries suffering because gold is critical to electronics. Goldbugs also forget that to prevent currency manipulation you were required by law to turn in most of your gold including jewelry. You could only own so much buillion, jewelry, and coinage. The rest had to be deposited at banks.
Also post WW2 lots of gold began flooding the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this market from new mines. To stabilize currencies the central banks had to buy it up. Basically guaranteed profit because gold/dollar value was fixed. As more and more mines opened up the situation became untenable and thus banks got off gold backed currencies. It’s front loaded debt. In months time services , infrastructure and institutions are likely to start crumbling starved by these cuts ITT: A bunch of people from the West who do not want this kind of politician to succeed “westsplainig” why it won’t succeed to people living in the country who all feel like it’s working. Fucking backwards state, a school there just let a kid get beaten up and die. No one called an ambulance. Hopeless state.
Well, good luck. Getting a surplus is like buying a helmet and kneepads so that you can later buy the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this bike so that next month you can actually get on the bike, and then after that actually start peddling on your first practice run of 1000, to the next country over lol. In a nation where 51% of their exports are crops, and 31% are industrial materials and whatever is left is crude oil, the vast majority of that is hard-labor with sub-standard monetary returns for the laborers. That’s an economy that requires a lot of investment in public and social services. You can’t not invest that all right back into the people bc the people will start dying, crime will get worse, protections will significantly degrade, and that means even more rampant corruption and cronyism. There is no “cold-turkey” in a country of 46+ million people. There can only be incremental change.
To leverage your bike analogy, they were on their way directly at a wall, and your argument is why dodge the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this wall now when you will hypothetically just crash into it later? To top it off, you rightfully point out that it’s an economy that requires outside investment but don’t like that the steps necessary to return outside investment interest are being made? That’s an assumption you’re making, and has nothing to do with anything i’ve said. I never said i “don’t like” or “do like” the policy changes, my analogy does not imply that the journey is a sure-fire crash and burn situation, I was simply making a statement about how unpredictable the methodology was, and that the path to redemption is long and arduous and to get from point A to Z there cannot be any cheats or shortcuts in my opinion. Any surplus will immediately need to be used to help the people survive, imo, and we’ll see if that rings true or not. Now, that’s just my opinion. We will see what happens. Governance of a nation will never be the same as the governance of a business/corporation. It’s not just about the bottom-line and the figures and books balancing. This is an experiment, and for the sake of Argentinians, i really really hope it works out. Some of the greatest people in the world.
Did the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this opening of the Panama Canal screw Argentina? I remember that back in the late 1890s and early 1900s they had a roaring economy but then started declining around the time the Canal was opened. Did it weaken their trade or something or is it just a coincidence? Irrelevant to Argentina. They had a commodity export boom for a while, but didn’t increase the proceeds in anything useful. Nah, Britain was Argentina’s primary reason for being wealthy (The British purchased the vast majority of Argentine exports, chiefly beef). This wealth was also largely confined to the upper class and the agriculture industry. When WW1 hit there was a slight hiccup due to Britain being broke the whole war, but the Great Depression nuked Britain and by extension Argentina. They’ve never reliably bounced back since for a litany of reasons, but thats a super long topic lmao. Changes clearly had to be made, but now it remains to be seen what sticks and what not. And if the people have enough patience left to go though the hard initial part. It’s gonna be shittier before it gets better. Romania’s post revolution history dealt with similar issues of up to 250% inflation, it took from 1990 to 2005 to have the first year with inflation lower than 10%.
You can achieve a budget surplus by simply stopping any government spending. A fiscal deficit is the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this norm in any growing economy, this doesn’t mean shit tbh Can any Economics PhD holders please just tell us if this will work or not- the world is tired of this « will they won’t they » with this character The place for news articles about current events in the United States and the rest of the world. Discuss it all here. See a post that violates the rules below? Did your post get stuck in the spam filter? Have a question about the rules? Just want to give feedback? Send the mod team a message. is responding to spam. violates reddit’s site-wide rules. advocates or celebrates the death of another person. incites violence. Extreme or repeat offenders will be banned.
Under the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this same logic Jake couldn’t have consented either, so why is HE the only one being charged with rape? Militant feminists only want equality if it works in their favor. How about take responsibility for your actions and live with the consequences of making a bad decision. Josie should be held just as accountable for her poor choices. OR maybe rape charges shouldn’t extend to people with morning-after regret. Rape is violent. This is just a cop-out for irresponsibility. Can we take a second to talk about how he’s nose-deep in his frozen margarita and she’s laughing at him? She looks like the rapey one to me Neither can men, what if Josie raped jake but Josie’s playing victim of happens a lot and I hate society because of that I’m a sexual assault response and recovery coordinator. One thing most people get wrong is the fact that the male could possibly consent as well.
In a case such as this, technically they would both have legal rights to initiate a claim. What direction they would go from there is anybody’s guess and more based on context, level of consumption, witnesses etc etc. It’s even possible that a case such this could end where both are deemed victims and both are left seeking medical support. The US Navy had these hanging up in the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this ship i was attached to for a while. People kept taping “Josie raped James” to them and eventually they got taken down But they’re both drunk. So wouldn’t they be raping each other right. How come it’s only Josie who doesn’t give consent? Go to a photoshoot. Your phots with drinks go to a stock website. You get your money, everything seems alright. Then after many years, you see your face as a rapist. Be responsible
Plot twist: Josie was not drunk. She sexually assaulted Jake and falsely reported him in order to win a bet she made with her friend. I think they did some kind of study and figured out that the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this good guys are now scared to have sex for fear of false allegations and the people that would have taken advantage of women anyways don’t really care about these kinds of things. I have always thought the “drunk cannot consent” rule was stupid as hell. Every other act you perform while drunk is held to the same standard of the law (if you kill someone while drunk you are still a murderer). The exception is if the state you are in is not directly caused by YOUR actions (getting roofied). Other than that kind of thing….you made the choice to drink so any actions after are yours too. If you consented while drunk…you consented, end of story. Regretting your choice does not make the other person a rapist be it man or woman. i was drunk, she wasnt. heard a rumor 6 months later she was knocked up, and then i spent 18 years paying child support.
The moral here is any interaction between a man and a woman where legality is involved the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this man is screwed because he is the bad guy by default. Women are inferior to men. So men are more accountable. Kind of like how you’re accountable to a pet. Is what they are saying. The fucking thing doesn’t even make sense. Why is the guy the instant rapist? Seems to me like they were drunk and both had sex with eachother… This’ll get downvotes but consent is consent even if you give it while inebriated. People shouldn’t drink to excess, and if they are drunk, their recollection of events ain’t worth shit and shouldn’t be allowed to be held up in court. This is true though. Men you need to be careful because you’re guilty until proven innocent. And even if you are innocent, well your life is already ruined and your reputation is destroyed. The kicker? Nothing will happen to her. Idunno about the poster but at my college we got forced to do effectively consent training and they legit taught that if you’re a guy at a party drunk and a drunk girl comes up grabs you, kisses you and says come with me and go with her to her bedroom and she initiates sex that if she regrets it tomorrow you sexually assaulted her as the man. So yes this bullshit still exists. Probably not, but that’s still very much the sentiment. Years ago I fell for a girl but she didn’t feel the same about me but webecame really good friends for years. After the initial rejection I only saw her as a friend and every hang out was extremely platonic. We would stay at eachothers houses all the time sometimes even sleeping in the same bed but there was no hint of romance ever. One night though, like three years of it being like that we got got very drunk and had sex. I assumed it was just that and nothing more and things would be normal the next day. Nope. Police at my door in the morning asking if I raped her. I told them we were drunk and had sex but that was it. I was arrested but not charged as she decided not to pursue it. But our friendship was over instantly. In her eyes, the cops eyes, and all of our mutual friends I was a predator. The funny thing? Shekissed me first and I pushed her away. She put her hand down my pants and I told her to stop. Doesn’t matter. Men are always the predator and women are always the victim.
This does seem like a double standard, she’s too drunk to consent, he has to be cognizant of that even while drunk. Also obviously if violence was used this doesn’t apply, but that’s not the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this message here. Now if you look at woman the wrong way you can be charged wit sexual assault, domestic violence, arson, genocide… He could very well be charged for rape, whether or not it’s right, that’s the way the courts see it. It’s still a very valid PSA, even if for the wrong reasons. And this is why Gen Z is having less sex than previous gens, and why so many young men are checking out of the dating pool and getting their minds warped by right-wing grifters. It actually depends on the sex act. penetration enacted by Jake would constitute assault by him. fellatio or penetration enacted by Josie would constitute assault by her. A person can be drunk and not commit a crime. A person can be drunk and be the victim of a crime. The specific action does matter, although drunk parties may be unreliable narrators. The infamous Brock Turner for instance did drink, but he assaulted the drunk victim and was not a victim himself. There are legitimately women alive right now, who believe this is true. This is the sexual assault equivalent of, “girl punches guy in face. Everyone stops and watches. Guy punches back at girl. 12 dudes come running in and tackle guy.”
Jake is blind. Josie is blind. They walked into each other on a street and both stumbled. Josie could not see Jake. The next day, Jake was charged with assault. Because only women are mentally weak like that. Men are always bastions of mental and physical fortitude and if the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this do something wrong it’s because they had bad evil intentions lol You literally hurt my soul I would literally shoot a shotgun full of Lego into my eyeballs then have to read your sheer stupidity again I’m straigh,t but from my view it looks like Jake has nicer bone structure, and the chick definitely looks more into him than he is into her. Jeez, I thought his comment was a little silly too but that’s a little extreme lmao. Bro does not like when his drinking is criticized OK, let’s look at this from a mid-2000s perspective and not a 2024 one. Obviously consent goes both ways right now. HOWEVER, back when, there was the myth of “we were both drunk, so it’s okay” as an excuse for SA. The message here is that you can’t use drunkenness for these crimes. Except the scenario they described wouldn’t have worked back then either. Nowhere in the scenario do they say that Jake forced himself on her or was in a state he himself was in more control than she was. They describe consensual drunken sex where both parties are equally intoxicated. The case would have gone nowhere.
They need to add more detail for this scenario make any sense. For instance: was she passed out drunk and he not? Ah context helps. I was too young at that time. However, in the Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3 In addition,I will do this early 10’s, when at uni, a random dude in one of my class raped someone pretty much passed out using the logic you described. No one was on his side, thankfully. I believe public health / safety posters on those topics are better nowadays. This one is quite extreme and altogether bad. Hold on a minute so if she wasn’t drunk and they hooked up wouldn’t she be the rapist. Also what if Josie was his cousin and they normally hookup but Jake was drunk this one time is he still a rapist? Dumb poster with an incredibly flawed logic, if two drunk people have sex it’s mutual end of discussion. If the girl can’t consent and she’s drunk then the same logic must apply for the drunk man. This woke BS needs to end. Double standard. If they’re both intoxicated, and that precludes the woman from giving consent, then the man was also unable to give consent. Why wouldn’t she be charged? I’ll tell you why. Because women have the luxury of being on the beneficial end of every double standard in our society including the ability to retroactively decide a sexual encounter they regret wasn’t consensual. I don’t really agree with this. Absolutely rape is wrong and should not be tolerated but how can you say she is drunk so she cannot make an informed decision but hold him accountable for his decision when he is drunk as well? Kind of a double standard. Well let’s be straight here, if Jake was drunk he couldn’t give any consent either… so he was also in essence raped according to that logic… but that’s not how it works is it, it’s only the woman who’s the victim. Both were victims by the way they’re describing it.
Description for Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3
Be the first to review “Florida-State-Seminoles-x-Santa-Grinch-Is-This-Jolly-Enough-Merry-Christmas-Shirt3”
You must be logged in to post a review.
- Length from the highest point of the collar to the bottom hem.
- Chest straight across, armpit to armpit, with the shirt laid flat.
- Sleeve from the center back of the collar to the cuff.
| Size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|
| S | 2871 | 1846 |
| M | 2974 | 2051 |
| L | 3076 | 2256 |
| XL | 3179 | 2461 |
| 2XL | 3281 | 2666 |
| 3XL | 3384 | 2871 |
| 4XL | 3486 | 3076 |
| 5XL | 3589 | 3281 |
| Size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|
| S | 2564 | 1641 |
| M | 2666 | 1743 |
| L | 26.567 | 1846 |
| XL | 2769 | 19.750 |
| 2XL | 27.971 | 21.655 |
| 3XL | 28.572 | 22.758 |
| Size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|
| S | 2871 | 1846 |
| M | 2974 | 2051 |
| L | 3076 | 2256 |
| XL | 3179 | 2461 |
| 2XL | 3281 | 2666 |
| 3XL | 3384 | 2871 |
| Size | Length | Chest | Sleeve |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 2666 | 2051 | 33.585 |
| M | 2769 | 2256 | 34.588 |
| L | 2871 | 2461 | 35.590 |
| XL | 2974 | 2666 | 36.593 |
| 2XL | 3076 | 2871 | 37.595 |
| 3XL | 3179 | 3076 | 38.598 |
| 4XL | 3281 | 3281 | 38.598 |
| 5XL | 3486 | 3384 | 38.598 |
| Size | Length | Chest | Sleeve |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 2769 | 2051 | 34.588 |
| M | 2871 | 2256 | 35.590 |
| L | 2974 | 2461 | 36.593 |
| XL | 3076 | 2666 | 37.595 |
| 2XL | 3179 | 2871 | 38.598 |
| 3XL | 3281 | 3076 | 3999 |
| 4XL | 3384 | 3281 | 39.5100 |
| 5XL | 3486 | 3486 | 40102 |
| Size | Length | Chest | Sleeve |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 2871 | 1846 | 33.585 |
| M | 2974 | 2051 | 3589 |
| L | 3076 | 2358 | 36.593 |
| XL | 3179 | 2461 | 3897 |
| 2XL | 3281 | 2666 | 39.5100 |
| 3XL | 3384 | 2871 | 39.5100 |
| Size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|
| S | 2769 | 1846 |
| M | 2871 | 2051 |
| L | 2974 | 2256 |
| XL | 3076 | 2461 |
| 2XL | 3179 | 2666 |
| Size | Youth size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 6-8 | 20.552 | 1641 |
| M | 10-12 | 2256 | 1743 |
| L | 14-16 | 23.560 | 1846 |
| XL | 18-20 | 2564 | 1948 |
| Size | Youth size | Length | Chest |
|---|---|---|---|
| S | 6-8 | 2153 | 1743 |
| M | 10-12 | 22.557 | 1846 |
| L | 14-16 | 2461 | 1948 |
| XL | 18-20 | 25.565 | 2051 |
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.